The Thirst for Bottled Water

Summary: You’d be hard pressed to turn on a TV, flip through a newspaper or drive down the street without seeing a bottled water advertisement. With special claims made by those trying to one-up competitors, it’s no longer just water. But what makes certain waters different? The following helps to distinguish how bottled water is classified.

Bottled water continues to surge as a healthy product of choice among consumers looking to quench their thirst. Globally, sales have increased a whopping 17.8 percent over the past year. In North America alone, sales have jumped from $8.4 billion to $13.3 billion in a year—accounting for 68 percent of the total growth. Last year in the United States, the average person consumed 18.2 gallons of bottled water— an increase of 1.2 gallons per person average over the previous year.

While consumers are fickle, the popularity and increased demand for bottled water continues to grow as people desire better quality and consistency and are willing to pay for the product. But what exactly are consumers buying inside those plastic containers and what are beverage producers doing to maintain a safe, consistent product flowing to thirsty customers?

Not all waters are equal

Within the non-carbonated bottled water market there are two primary products—spring water and purified water. These two products account for the majority of the industry’s sales and consumption. Also included in the market are artesian, drinking, mineral and well waters that are also bottled and sold but only represent a small sales percentage.

So the question now is, “With so many types of water out on the shelves, how does one know exactly what he/ she is getting?” Fortunately for the US consumer, bottled water is a regulated food product. Local and state public health departments along with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversee the packaging and labeling of bottled water products in the United States.

While the FDA does a good job of monitoring the label content, the average consumer is generally unaware of what’s in the bottle. To help define the types of bottled water on the market, the FDA has defined the following types:

Artesian water: Water from a well that taps a confined aquifer (a water-bearing underground layer of rock or sand) in which the water level stands at some height above the top of the aquifer.

Drinking water: Water that’s sold for human consumption in sanitary containers and contains no added sweeteners or chemical additives. It may be rebottled tap water treated at a municipal source and retreated by simple filtration.

Mineral water: It’s distinguished by a constant level and relative proportion of minerals and trace elements (not less than 250 parts per million, ppm, of total dissolved solids, TDS). These minerals and elements must occur naturally from the water sources and cannot be added at the time of bottling.

Purified water: Water that has been produced by distillation, deionization, reverse osmosis (RO) or another process and meets the definition of purified water in the US Pharmacopoeia (USP) 23.

Spring water: Water derived from an underground source from which water flows naturally to the surface of the Earth. Spring water must be collected only at the spring or through a borehole tapping the underground spring. Spring water can be collected with an external force, but must be from the same underground stratum as the spring and must have all the physical properties, composition and quality before treatment.

Closely watched

Beyond verifying that contents match the label, bottled water is one of the most closely regulated food products under FDA jurisdiction. Provisions from the FDA’s general food Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) regulations and a set of bottled water-specific GMP regulations—which include requirements for plant and equipment design and construction, sanitary facilities and operations for production and process controls—all apply to bottled water products.

The FDA also sets quality standards that include established regulations for allowable substance levels such as coliform and lead. Additionally, maximum acceptable levels for microbiological quality; physical quality such as turbidity, color and odor; chemical quality; limiting organic and inorganic chemicals; and radiological limits are established.

Details and requirements for each of the water types can be found in the FDA Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21, parts 103, 129, 165 and 184.

Generally, state-level regulations vary but each conduct specific inspections of bottled water sources and facilities to ensure both the source and the production line’s end product are safe for consumers.

The International Bottled Water Association (IBWA), whose member companies (US and international bottlers, distributors and suppliers) distribute 80 percent of the bottled water sold in the United States, have also set standards that are stricter than the FDA’s. These include annual, unannounced plant inspection by nationally recognized third-party organizations such as NSF International. Details—and differences with other standards—and can be found in the IBWA Model Code (www.bottledwater.org/public/model_ main.htm)

Clearly, there’s more to producing bottled water than opening the valve, filling the bottle and capping it. When a bottler decides to add a water product to its line, there are a number of factors that go into deciding what product it should make and how to proceed. The two primary considerations are the water source and what equipment is necessary to produce it.

Quality vs. quantity

The source plays a pivotal role in the bottler’s ability to produce the desired quantity and quality of bottled water, and maintain production over time while remaining profitable. Nearly 25 percent of all bottled water comes from municipal sources while the remainder comes from natural sources such as springs and wells. Regardless of the source, the water must be inspected, tested and certified by the state or country of origin. The water must be of sanitary quality in order to begin and continue bottling from the same source.

Aside from the quantity of available water, amounts of organics and inorganics present as well as the quantity of TDS help determine if the source is practical.

Equipment requirements

Every consumer expects to obtain a product free from color, taste and odor. Color is primarily attributed to organic materials in the water, although metal ions may also taint the water. The human nose can detect odors down to the parts per billion level. Activated carbon will adsorb odors and many dissolved organics that give color to drinking water as well as eliminate chlorine and other halogens that can affect taste and odor. Membrane filtration can remove organic impurities, metal and other ions. Ozone can break down organic constituents and reduce their odor potential while also sanitizing to minimize further microbial contamination. Care must be exercised to assure that steps are taken to reduce bromate formation, however, for sources containing the organic bromide ion can be inconsistent.

After the source is determined to be acceptable, the bottler’s next step is to conduct an audit of existing plant equipment and design to determine what must be done to get the plant up and producing bottled water. A brief checklist of first steps for determining existing capabilities includes:

1. Checking the original design flow rate to determine the plant’s current bottling capacity and ability to expand future bottling capacity;

2. Determining the actual flow rate available from the source and accounting for possible changes in seasonal quantity and quality, while determining what the future flow rate might be based on population and usage trends;

3. Determining the plant’s water usage requirements, and

4. Assessing removal efficiencies and disinfection capabilities of existing equipment.

Depending on the type of water the bottler decides to produce, many of the plant’s existing devices for filtration and disinfection can be integrated into the design of the plant’s bottled water production line.

The two biggest sellers on the market are spring water and purified water. While these two products are generally viewed as high quality, they differ significantly in the treatment required to obtain the end product.

Spring water

The FDA holds bottled spring water to all of its bottled water quality and labeling requirements. A challenge for spring water bottlers is that the water source must be an actual spring that can supply and sustain the required water quantity and is located close enough to the bottling facility to make it economically feasible to produce.

A typical spring water treatment process includes a filtration system that generally runs in series—5-micron filtration to 0.2-micron filtration. Spring water has no set standards for TDS, so inconsistencies may exist in the quantity of TDS and amounts of calcium, chlo-ride, CO 2, sulfate and pH range.

After filtration, spring water is usually treated with ozone to disinfect and preserve the water in the bottle. By maintaining the nature of the spring water, ozone is considered to be an acceptable disinfectant. Ozone oxidizes bacteria and organic materials and, over time, reverts back to oxygen.

 

Purified water

Purified water is the most highly treated and closely regulated bottled water product, but offers the most consistent and highest quality water to the consumer. Bottlers of purified water find that consumers choose purified water due to the flavor consistency that’s made possible by the purification process. Likewise, the ability to offer a consistent, high quality product has helped spur consumer demand.

Purified water currently must meet the requirements set forth in the USP requirement for purified water under supplement 23 as issued in January 1995. There are three primary processes used to produce purified water: deionization, distillation and RO. Today, bottlers may choose RO over the others due to many inherent advantages offered and more recent measures implemented by membrane manufacturers to improve performance and reduce cost.

  • Removes nearly all organic compounds and 90-to-99 percent of all ions;
  • Can meet most water standards with a single-pass system and the highest standards with a double-pass system;
  • Rejects 99.9 percent of viruses, bacteria and pyrogens (fever-producing substances);
  • Is more energy efficient compared to heat-driven purification such as distillation, and
  • Is more efficient than the strong chemicals required for ion exchange and is capable of removing organics, virus and bacteria that’s not possible with deionization.

A typical RO system for purified water is portrayed in Figure 1.

Conclusion

The growing demand for bottled water is likely to continue in the United States and the world well into this decade. Fortunately, the technology required in meeting demand for high quality, safe and convenient water is available today. For the bottler, adding a bottled water product to the production line will help meet that demand and, if done wisely, turn a profit.

References

1. Information Resources Inc., “Total Food, Drug and Mass Merchandising,” survey for 52 weeks ended April 22, 2001, Chicago.

2. International Bottled Water Association (IBWA), website, September 2001: http:// www.bottledwater.org

3. Food and Drug Administration, “Laws Enforced by the FDA and Related Statutes,” website: http://www.fda.gov/opacom/ laws/lawtoc.htm & Pure Water Handbook, 2nd Edition, Osmonics, Minnetonka, Minn.,